darknet.cpp File Reference

Include dependency graph for src-cli/darknet.cpp:

Functions
void	run_detector (int argc, char **argv)
void	run_nightmare (int argc, char **argv)
void	run_char_rnn (int argc, char **argv)
void	run_vid_rnn (int argc, char **argv)
void	run_art (int argc, char **argv)
void	average (int argc, char *argv[])
void	speed (const char *cfgfile, int tics)
void	operations (char *cfgfile)
void	oneoff (char *cfgfile, char *weightfile, char *outfile)
void	partial (char *cfgfile, char *weightfile, char *outfile, int max)
void	rescale_net (char *cfgfile, char *weightfile, char *outfile)
void	rgbgr_net (char *cfgfile, char *weightfile, char *outfile)
void	reset_normalize_net (char *cfgfile, char *weightfile, char *outfile)
Darknet::Layer	normalize_layer (Darknet::Layer l, int n)
void	normalize_net (char *cfgfile, char *weightfile, char *outfile)
void	statistics_net (const char *cfgfile, const char *weightfile)
void	denormalize_net (char *cfgfile, char *weightfile, char *outfile)
void	visualize (const char *cfgfile, const char *weightfile)
void	darknet_signal_handler (int sig)
int	main (int argc, char **argv)

Function Documentation

run_detector()

void run_detector ( int  argc, char **  argv  )

extern

Todo:

V3 look through these and see what we no longer need

Todo:

get rid of the old C-style filename access and use std::filesystem::path within the functions so we're not passing these around as char* parms

Todo:

why only do this if ngpus > 1? Is this a bug? Should it be zero?

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

run_nightmare()

void run_nightmare ( int  argc, char **  argv  )

extern

Here is the caller graph for this function:

run_char_rnn()

void run_char_rnn ( int  argc, char **  argv  )

extern

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

run_vid_rnn()

void run_vid_rnn ( int  argc, char **  argv  )

extern

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

run_art()

void run_art ( int  argc, char **  argv  )

extern

average()

void average	(	int	argc,
		char *	argv[]
	)

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

speed()

void speed	(	const char *	cfgfile,
		int	tics
	)

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

operations()

void operations

(

char *

cfgfile

)

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

oneoff()

void oneoff	(	char *	cfgfile,
		char *	weightfile,
		char *	outfile
	)

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

partial()

void partial	(	char *	cfgfile,
		char *	weightfile,
		char *	outfile,
		int	max
	)

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

rescale_net()

void rescale_net	(	char *	cfgfile,
		char *	weightfile,
		char *	outfile
	)

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

rgbgr_net()

void rgbgr_net	(	char *	cfgfile,
		char *	weightfile,
		char *	outfile
	)

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

reset_normalize_net()

void reset_normalize_net	(	char *	cfgfile,
		char *	weightfile,
		char *	outfile
	)

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

normalize_layer()

Darknet::Layer normalize_layer	(	Darknet::Layer	l,
		int	n
	)

Here is the caller graph for this function:

normalize_net()

void normalize_net	(	char *	cfgfile,
		char *	weightfile,
		char *	outfile
	)

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

statistics_net()

void statistics_net	(	const char *	cfgfile,
		const char *	weightfile
	)

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

denormalize_net()

void denormalize_net	(	char *	cfgfile,
		char *	weightfile,
		char *	outfile
	)

Todo:

V3: I'm willing to bet this is supposed to be LSTM, not GRU...?

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

visualize()

void visualize	(	const char *	cfgfile,
		const char *	weightfile
	)

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

darknet_signal_handler()

void darknet_signal_handler

(

int

sig

)

Here is the call graph for this function:

Here is the caller graph for this function:

main()

int main	(	int	argc,
		char **	argv
	)

Todo:

V3 look through these and see what we no longer need

Todo:

V3 "3d" seems to combine 2 images into a single alpha-blended composite. It works...but does it belong in Darknet? What is this for?